Skip to main content

Full text of "Surveys of significant plant resources in southeast and south-central Montana on the Billings and Miles City field offices of the Bureau of Land Management"

See other formats


Surveys of Significant Plant Resources 

in Southeast and South-central 

Montana on the Billings and Miles 

City Field Offices of the Bureau of 

Land Management 



Prepared for: 

Bureau of Land Management 

Montana State Office and the 

Billings and Miles City Field Offices 



By: 
Scott Mincemoyer 



Montana Natural Heritage Program 

Natural Resource Information System 

Montana State Library 



MONTANA 



^^^ Natural Heritage 
^^^ Program 



Surveys of Significant Plant Resources 

in Southeast and South-central 

Montana on the Billings and Miles 

City Field Offices of the Bureau of 

Land Management 



Prepared for: 

Bureau of Land Management 

Montana State Office and the 

Billings and Miles City Field Offices 



Agreement Number: 
ESA010009-#26 



By: 

Scott Mincemoyer 




M () M 1" A \ A 



Natural Heritage 
Program 




^^ M (> \ T A N fl ^fmrnk MONTANA 

0|tat6 « i tS). Natural Resource 

jub] 



Obrary ^^^ information System 



© 2006 Montana Natural Heritage Program 

P.O. Box 201800 • 1515 East Sixth Avenue • Helena, MT 59620-1800 • 406-444-5354 



This document should be cited as follows: 

Mincemoyer, S. 2006. Surveys of Significant Plant Resources in Southeast and South-central Montana 
on the Billings and Miles City Field Offices of the Bureau of Land Management. Report to the USD! 
Bureau of Land Management, Billings and Miles City Field Offices. Montana Natural Heritage Program, 
Helena, MT. 22 pp. + appendices. 



11 



Executive Summary 



Lands managed by the Billings and Miles City 
Field Offices of the Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM) cover large areas of south- 
central and eastern Montana. However, for 
purposes of this report, the project area is limited 
to BLM lands in Big Horn, Carbon, Carter, 
Custer, Fallon, Powder River, Prairie and 
Rosebud Counties, and excludes the northeast 
portion of the Miles City Field Office as well as 
Billings Field Office lands outside of Big Horn 
and Carbon Counties. 

The distribution of BLM lands in this area varies 
from large tracts of land covering areas of tens 
of thousands of acres to very small isolated 
tracts less than a square mile in size. Surface 
acres managed by the Billings Field Office were 
listed at 454.859 acres in 2003 and 245,742 
acres in the two target counties (Big Horn and 
Carbon). BLM lands in Carbon County alone 
account for over 200,000 acres. In the Miles 
City Field Office, 2.7 million acres are under 
BLM management, with almost 1.9 million 
acres of that total in the seven targeted counties, 
bringing the total potential survey acreage in the 
project area to approximately 2.1 million acres. 

The purpose of this report is to document the 
results of surveys in 2005 and 2006 for plant 
Species of Concern (SOC) on lands 
administered by the two Field Offices and to 
provide information pertinent to management of 
these species. However, a great deal of 
information pertaining to the ecology, 
distribution, abundance and management of 
several of these taxa is still lacking and the 
collection of much of that information is beyond 
the scope of this provincial project. Information 
on biology, ecology, rank factors and 
management as it pertains to individual Species 
of Concern can be found on the Montana 



Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) website 
( www.mtnhp.org ). 

Plant Species of Concern in Montana currently 
include all SI and S2 taxa along with G3 
(globally vulnerable) taxa. Many of these 
species are also ranked as "Sensitive" on BLM 
lands in the state (Bureau of Land Management 
2005). 

The field surveys conducted during this project 
help to provide a clearer picture of the 
abundance and distribution of these species, not 
only on BLM Field Office lands, but across the 
project area. Positive survey results, as well as 
negative survey results (not finding a species in 
a particular location), provide valuable 
information that will be useful for conservation 
planning and management decisions across 
BLM lands and other ownerships in the state. 

Field surveys conducted as part of this study in 
2005-2006 documented new locations of 
Physaiia brassicoides, Haplopappus 
carthamoides var. subsquarrosits and 
Sphaeromeria capitata. Known occurrences of 
Cleome lutea and Eriogonum visheh were re- 
surveyed and their mapped locations expanded. 
Four occurrences of Aslragahis grayi and two 
occurrences of Mentzelia pumila in Carbon 
County were re-surveyed and their locations and 
extent better documented. The locations of 
several other SOC occurrences were revisited, 
though the surveys failed to relocate the target 
species. 

Additionally, one species that has been reported 
for the state, Ciisium piilcherrimum was 
conclusively documented on BLM lands from an 
area of Powder River County. 



Ill 



Acknowledgements 



Thanks to Dr. David Keil at California 
Polytechnic State University for verifying the 
identification of Cirsium pulcherrimum 
specimens collected during fieldwork conducted 
as part of this project. Thanks to Cathy Seibert 
at the Montana State University Herbarium for 
providing access to the collections there. At the 
MTNHP, Linda Vance conducted field surveys 
and provided valuable data and input, Coburn 
Currier checked the spatial representations of 



most of the SOC occurrences in the two BLM 
Field Offices and re-mapped many of these to 
improve their accuracy and precision, and Kathy 
Lloyd entered and checked the tabular data for 
all SOC occurrences on the two Field Offices. 
As always, thanks to Kathy Lloyd and Coburn 
Currier for editing and final printing, though any 
omissions or errors are of my own doing. 



IV 



Table of Contents 

Introduction 1 

Project Area 2 

Methods 5 

Results 10 

Billings Field Office Survey Results 10 

Miles City Field Office Survey Results 11 

Herbaria Searches 12 

Additional Data Entry and Mapping 13 

Discussion and Recommendations 16 

Future Survey and Monitoring Recommendations 16 

BLM Status Recommendations 17 

Heritage Status Recommendations and Changes 18 

Additional Recommendations and Discussion 19 

Priority Areas 19 

References 21 

Appendix A. Global/State Rank Definitions 

Appendix B. Maps of General Survey Areas and Routes Listed by County 

Appendix C. Species Account for Cirsium piilcheirimum 

List OF Figures 

Figure 1. Billings Field Office with general locations of MTNHP Species of Concern 3 

Figure 2. Miles City Field Office with general locations of MTNHP Species of Concern 4 

List of Tables 

Table 1. Vascular Plant Species of Concern known from BLM lands in the project area 5 

Table 2. Additional Vascular Plant Species of Concern known from ownerships other than BLM 8 

Table 3. Areas of BLM land surveyed during this project with major findings 13 



Introduction 



Lands administered by the Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM) cover vast and diverse areas 
of Montana. As such, BLM lands provide 
significant habitat for many species of 
conservation concern within the state. BLM lands 
in the Billings and Miles City Field Offices are no 
different and accordingly harbor significant 
populations of several vascular plant Species of 
Concern. 

Plant Species of Concern (SOC) in Montana 
currently include all SI and S2 taxa along with G3 
(globally vulnerable) taxa. Many of these species 
are also ranked as "Sensitive" on BLM lands in the 
state (Bureau of Land Management 2005). See 
Appendix A for a full description of global and 
state rank definitions. 

Numerous surveys and reports are available that 
document vascular plants on BLM-administered 
lands within the Billings and Miles City Field 
Offices. These surveys and reports include the 
following: 

Botanical surveys in Carter County (Vanderhorst et 
al. 1998), surveys for globally significant plants in 
parts of Big Horn and Rosebud Counties (Barton 
and Crispin 2003), surveys in Hanging Women 
Basin in Big Horn County (Carlson and Cooper 
2003), surveys for Astragalus barrii and Physaria 
didynwcatpa var. lanata in parts of Big Horn and 
Rosebud Counties (Taylor and Caners 2002), plant 
Species of Concern in Powder River County 
(Heidel et al. 2002), botanical survey of the 
Tongue River area (Heidel 1 997), surveys for 
Querciis macrocaipa (Heidel 1993) and vascular 
plant surveys in the Pryor Mountain Desert (Lesica 
and Achuff 1992a). 

Several other pertinent reports on plant Species of 
Concern in the area are also available, including 
sensitive plant surveys on the Ashland District of 
the Custer National Forest (Heidel and Marriott 
1996), sensitive plant surveys in the Sioux District, 
Custer National Forest (Heidel and Dueholm 
1995), rare plants of the Bighorn Canyon National 



Recreation Area (Heidel and Fertig 2000), 
conservation status of Eiiogonum x lagopus 
[Eriogonum brevicaule var. canum\ (Lesica and 
Achuff 1992b), conservation status of 
Haplopappus carthamoides var. subsquanosus 
(Lesica 1995a), conservation status of Shoshonea 
pulvinata (Shelly 1988), conservation status of 
LesquereUa lesicii (Lesica 1995b), status review of 
Astragalus barrii (Schassberger 1988) and 
monitoring Shoshonea pulvinata in the Pryor and 
Beartooth Mountains (Heidel 2001). 

The purpose of this report is to document the 
results of surveys in 2005 and 2006 for Species of 
Concern on lands administered by the two Field 
Offices and to provide information pertinent to 
management of these species. However, a great 
deal of information pertaining to the ecology, 
distribution, abundance and management of several 
of these taxa is still lacking and the collection of 
much of that information is beyond the scope of 
this provincial project. Information on biology, 
ecology, rank factors and management as it 
pertains to individual Species of Concern can be 
found on the MTNHP website ( www.mtnhp.org ). 

The field surveys conducted during this project 
help to provide a clearer picture of the abundance 
and distribution of these species, not only on BLM 
Field Office lands, but across the project area. 
Positive survey results, as well as negative survey 
results (not finding a species in a particular 
location), provide valuable information that will be 
useful for conservation planning and management 
decisions across BLM lands and other ownerships 
in the state. This is the third project completed in 
recent years that documents plant SOC on BLM 
land. Previously, BLM lands managed by the 
Dillon and Butte Field Offices were surveyed in 
2002-2003 and 2003-2005 respectively (Lesica 
2003, Mincemoyer 2005). 

Nomenclature and taxonomy in this report 
generally follows Vascular Plants of Montana 
(Dorn 1984) and Vascular Plants of Wyoming — 
Third Edition (Dorn 2001). 



Project Area 



Lands managed by the Billings and Miles City 
Field Offices of the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) cover large areas of south-central and 
eastern Montana. However, for purposes of this 
report, the project area is limited to BLM lands in 
Big Horn, Carbon, Carter, Custer, Fallon, Powder 
River, Prairie and Rosebud Counties, and excludes 
the northeast portion of the Miles City Field Office 
as well as Billings Field Office lands outside of 
Big Horn and Carbon Counties. Figures 1 and 2 
provide locations of the project area as well as the 
general location of BLM lands within these areas. 

The distribution of BLM lands in this area varies 
from large tracts of lands covering areas of tens of 
thousands of acres to very small isolated tracts less 
than a square mile in size. Surface acres managed 
by the Billings Field Office were listed at 454,859 
acres in 2003 and 245,742 acres in the two target 
counties (Big Horn and Carbon). BLM lands in 
Carbon County alone account for over 200,000 
acres. In the Miles City Field Office, 2.7 million 
acres are under BLM management, with almost 1.9 
million acres of that total in the seven targeted 
counties, bringing the total potential survey 
acreage in the project area to approximately 2.1 
million acres. 



BLM lands in the project area generally occur in 
valley bottoms or on lower mountain slopes. 
Many areas are dominated by highly dissected or 
badlands topography with sparse vegetation cover. 
A continental, semi-arid climate prevails over the 
project area. Livestock grazing is one of the 
primary land uses across the region. 

Dominant vegetation in the area is sagebrush 
steppe, wheatgrass-needlegrass grasslands, salt 
desert scrub, desert scrub and woodlands of 
juniper, ponderosa pine and limber pine. 
Sagebrush species that may be locally dominant 
are Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis 
(Wyoming big sagebrush), Artemisia nova (black 
sagebrush) and Artemisia pedatifida (birdsfoot 
sage), the latter species being confined to the 
Bighorn Basin of Carbon County. Other woody 
species that may be locally dominant or co- 
dominant include Chrysothamnus nauseosus 
(rubber rabbitbrush), and Atriplex confertifolia 
(shadscale) and A. gardneri (Gardner's saltbush) in 
saline or alkaline sites. Non-native plant species 
are common in many parts of the project area with 
the introduced annual brome grasses, Bromus 
tectorum (cheatgrass) and B. japonicus (Japanese 
brome) the most widespread and abundant. 



Figure I. Billings Field Office with general locations of MTNHP Species of Concern. Only the portion of the Field Office in Carbon County is 
displayed within the larger map. BLM lands in Big Horn County are shown with the Miles City Field Office in Figure 2. 



Legend 



Billings Field Office Ownership 

BLM 

MTDNRC 

^H MTFWP 

^H state Trust Lsndi 



National Paric Service 

USFWS 

USPS 

Privalc Land 




Figure 2. Miles City Field Office wilJi general locations of MTNHP Species of Concern. Only areas within the 
seven southeastern Montana counties are highlighted within the larger map. 



Legend 



MTFWP 

MT State Trjst Lands 

Naliortal P-ark Service 

Private Lard 

US Dept of Agriculture 

USPS 

V\^ter 




Methods 



Before the start of Che 2005 field season potential 
sample areas were identified by BLM staff and the 
MTNHP. Target vascular plant species identified 
for survey include all BLM Sensitive plants from 
the area (Table I) and several additional SOC in 
the area that had not been located on BLM lands 
prior to 2005 (Table 2). Field surveys were 
conducted by Heritage Program Botany and 
Ecology staff during 2005-2006. 

Surveys were concentrated in areas listed in Table 
3. In addition to the fieldwork component, visits to 
the University of Montana Herbarium (MONTU) 
and Montana State University Herbarium (MONT) 
were conducted to document existing occurrences 
for the Field Office and to collect specimen 
locations for many of the target species. Existing 
element occurrences in the MTNHP database were 
also checked for accuracy of locational data and 
spatial representation. This step was important due 
in part to a previous upgrade in database software 
that allows for digitally mapping polygonal 
features in contrast to the old software which only 
allowed for tracking occurrences as individual 



points. All survey data collected during this 
project will be entered into MTNHP databases. 

Conditions in 2005 appeared optimal for the 
growth and flowering of many species in the 
project area. Precipitation was abundant in the 
spring and throughout the growing season. In 
contrast, 2006 was a dry year and thus not optimal 
for conducting some of the surveys. Drought 
conditions during the second year undoubtedly 
made it more difficult to detect plant populations 
because growth and flowering were reduced for 
many species. Field surveys were conducted by 
Linda Vance in 2005 and by the author in 2005 and 
2006. 

Locations of all SOC encountered during surveys 
were documented on a MTNHP Plant Species of 
Concern Survey Form - 2005 Revision 
( www.mtnhp.org ). Information on abundance, 
specific location and area of occupancy, associated 
species and non-native species was recorded. 
Locations were georeferenced with a GPS receiver. 



Table I . Vascular Plant Species of Concern known from BLM lands within the projecl area prior to 2006. 



Taxa 


BLM 
Status 


Global 
Rank 


State 
Rank 


County Distribution 


Aiabis deinlssa 
(daggett rock cress) 


SensLiive 


G5 


SI 


Carbon 


Ascleplas sTenophylla 
(narrowleaf milkweed) 


Sensitive 


G4G5 


SI 


Carter, Rosebud 


Astragalus areHoides 
(sweelwater milkvetch) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Big Horn, Carbon 


Astragalus bairii 
(Barr's milkvelch) 


Sensitive 


G3 


S3 


Big Horn, Carter, Powder River, 
Rosebud 


Astragalus geyerl 
(Geyer's milkvetch) 


Sensitive 


G4 


S2 


Carbon, Custer, Dawson, Garfield 


Astragalus gray! 
(Gray's milkvelch) 


Sensitive 


G4? 


SIS2 


Carbon 


Astragalus oreganus 
(Wind River milkvetch) 


Sensitive 


G4? 


SI 


Carbon 


Astragalus raceinosus 
(raceme milkvetch) 




G5 


S2 


Carter. Fallon 


Camissonia andina 
(obscure evening-primrose) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Carbon, Missoula, Ravaili 


Camissonia parvula 
(small camissonia) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Carbon 


Carex cranei 
(Crawe's sedge) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S2 


Cascade. Pondera, Powell, Prairie, 
Teton 



Taxa 


BLM 
Status 


Global 
Rank 


State 
Rank 


County Distribution 


Chenopodium subglabium 
(smooth goosefoot) 




G3G4 


SI 


Carter, Cascade, Custer, Powder River, 
Sheridan 


Cleome lutea 
(yellow bee plant) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Big Horn, Carbon 


Cryptantha scoparia 
(miner's candle) 


Sensitive 


G4? 


SI 


Carbon 


Cy per Its schweinitzli 
(Schweinitz' flatsedge) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S2 


Carter, Cascade, Custer, Powder River, 
Sheridan 


Da lea enneandia 
(nine-anther dalea) 




G5 


SI 


Big Horn, Custer, Fallon, Richland 


Dalea villosa 
(silky prairie clover) 




G5 


SI 


Carter, Richland, Sheridan 


Erigeron alio cot us 
(Big Horn fleabane) 




G3 


S3 


Big Horn, Carbon 


Eriogonum bievicaule var. 
camim (rabbit buckwheat) 




G3 


S3 


Big Horn, Carbon 


Eriogonum salsuginosum 
(Smooth Buckwheat) 


Sensitive 


G4? 


SI 


Carbon 


Eriogonum visheri 
(Visher's buckwheat) 


Sensitive 


G3 


SI 


Carter 


Grayia spinosa 
(spiny hopsage) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S2 


Beaverhead, Big Horn, Carbon, Park 


Haplopappus carthamoides 
van subsquarrosus 
(Beartooth goldenweed) 


Sensitive 


G4G5T2T3 


S1S2 


Carbon 


Hutchinsia procumhens 
(hutchinsia) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Beaverhead, Carbon, Flathead, Powell 


Leptodactylon caespitosum 
(leptodactylon) 


Sensitive 


G4 


S2 


Carbon 


Lesquerella lesicii 
(Lesica's bladderpod) 


Sensitive 


Gl 


SI 


Carbon 


Lomatium nunallii 
(Nuttall desert-parsley) 


Sensitive 


G3 


SI 


Big Horn, Rosebud 


Malacothrix torreyi 
(desert dandelion) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Carbon 


Mentzelia montana 
(white-bract stickleaf) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Beaverhead, Custer 


Mentzelia niida 
(bractless mentzelia) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Custer, Dawson, Powder River, 
Roosevelt, Rosebud, Valley 


Mentzelia pumila 
(dwarf mentzelia) 


Sensitive 


G4 


S2 


Carbon 


Nama densum 
(nama) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Carbon 


Nuttallanthiis texanus 
(blue toadflax) 




G4G5 


SI 


Carter, Dawson 


Pensfemon angusfifolius 
(narrowleaf penstemon) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S1S2 


Carter, Dawson, Fallon, Missoula 


Penstemon caryi 
(Gary's beardtongue) 




G3 


S3 


Carbon 


Phlox andicola 
(plains phlox) 


Sensitive 


G4 


S2 


Carter, Dawson, Powder River, 
Rosebud, Sheridan 


Physaria brassicoides 
(double bladderpod) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S2 


Carter, Custer, Petroleum, Powder 
River 



Taxa 


BLM 
Status 


Global 
Rank 


State 
Rank 


County Distribution 


Physaiia didymocarpa var. 
lanata (woolly twinpod) 


Sensitive 


G5T2 


SI 


Big Horn, Rosebud 


Plagiobothiys leptocladus 
(slender popcorn flower) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Beaverhead, Custer, Glacier, Phillips 


Poa cur (a 
(short-leaved bluegrass) 


Sensitive 


G4 


SI 


Carbon 


Psoralea hypogaea 
(little Indian breadroot) 




05 


S2S3 


Carter, Cascade, Chouteau, Fergus, 
Golden Valley, Petroleum, Powder 
River, Rosebud, Teton 


Que re us macrocarpa 
(bur oak) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SI 


Carter 


Rorippa calycina 
(persistent sepal yellowcress) 


Sensitive 


G3 


SI 


Big Horn, Cascade, Custer, McCone, 
Rosebud, Treasure, Yellowstone 


Shoshonea pulvinata 
(shoshonea) 


Sensitive 


G2G3 


SI 


Carbon 


Sphaeromeria capitata 
(rock-tansey) 




G3 


S3 


Beaverhead, Carbon 


Townsendia spathulata 
(sword townsendia) 




G3 


S3 


Beaverhead, Broadwater, Carbon, 
Madison, Silver Bow 



Table 2. Additional vascular plant Species 
BLM within t!ie project area prior to 2006. 
highlighted. 



of Concern, excluding alpine taxa, known from ownerships other than 
Those thought most likely to be documented from BLM lands are 



Taxa 


BLM 
Status 


Global 
Rank 


State 
Rank 


Habitat 


Adoxa moschateiUna 
(musk-root) 


Sensitive 


G5 


S2 


Vernally moist, rock slopes 


Amorpha canescens 

(lead plant) 


Sensitive 


G5 


SH 


Dry prairies 


Asclepias incarnata 

(swamp milkweed) 




G5 


SI 


Wet meadows, thickets 


Asclepias ovalifolia 

(oval-leaf milkweed) 




05? 


Si 


Open, pine woodlands, prairies 


Aster p farm icoides 

(prairie aster) 




05 


SI 


Open, dry grasslands 


Carex gravida 
(pregnant sedge) 




05 


S1S2 


Wooded draws 


Carex stenopt'da 
(small-winged sedge) 




02 


S1S2 


Grasslands and open forests in the montane 
and subalpine zones, and moist soil along 
streams in the valleys 


Ceanothus herbaceus 
(New Jersey tea) 




05 


SH 


Pine woodlands 


Centaurium exaltatum 

(western centaury) 




05 


SH 


Moist soil around ponds and streams 


Dichanthelium oligosattthes 
var. scribnerianum 

(Scribner's panic grass) 


Sensitive 


05T5 


SI 


Wooded draws 


Eleocharis rosfellata 
(beaked spikerush) 


Sensitive 


05 


S2 


Wet, often alkaline soils 


Epipactis gigantea 
(giant helleborine) 




0304 


S2 


Seeps and springs (thermal) 


Erigeron formosissimiis 
(beautiful fleabane) 




05 


SI 


Meadows and forest openings in the montane 
and subalpine zones 


Eupatorium maculatum 

Spotted joepye-weed) 




05 


SIS2 


Moist meadows, springs, stream margins and 
swamp thickets in the valleys and on the 
plains 


Gentianopsis simplex 
(hiker's gentian) 




05 


SI 


Fens, meadows, and seeps, usually in areas of 
crj'stalline parent material in the montane and 
subalpine zones 


Hemicarpha drummondii 

(Drummond's hemicarpha) 




0405 


SH 


Moist, sandy soil along rivers and streams in 
the valleys 


Maianthemum canadense 

(wild lily-of-t he-valley) 




05 


SH 


Moist, humic soil in riparian forest on the 
plains 


Penstemon grandiflorus 

(large-flowered penstemon) 




G5? 


Si 


Sandy soil of valleys and plains 


Potentilla plattensis 

(Platte cinquefoil) 


Sensitive 


04 


SI 


Grasslands and sagebrush steppe in the valley 
and montane zones 


Prunus pumila 

(sand cherry) 




05 


Si 


Sandy or rocky soils in plains grasslands 


Ranunculus jovis 
(Jove's buttercup) 








Sagebrush grasslands to open forest slopes in 
the montane and subalpine zones 


Senecio eremophilus 

(desert groundsel) 




05 


SIS2 


Moist streambanks and riparian forests in the 
valley and montane zones 


Sporobolus asper 

(longleaf dropseed) 




05 


SH 


Open forests and grasslands on the plains 



Taxa 


BLM 
Status 


Global 
Rank 


State 
Rank 


Habitat 


Stipa lettermanii 

(Letterman's tieedlegrass) 




G5 


SI 


Limestone talus and dry fescue grassland in 
the valley and foothill zones 


SulUvantia hapemanii 
(Wyoming sullivantia) 


Sensitive 


G3 


S2 


Calcareous rock walls and boulders at springs, 
waterfalls and streambanks 


Viburnum lentago 
(nannyberry) 




G5 


SI 


Openings in riparian forests on the plains 



Results 



Field surveys conducted as part of this study in 
2005-2006 documented new locations of Physaria 
brassicoides, Haplopappus carthamoides var. 
subsquarrosus and Sphaeromeria capitata. 
Known occurrences of Cleome lutea and 
Eiiogoiium visheri were re-surveyed and their 
mapped locations expanded. Four occurrences of 
Astragalus giayi and two occurrences of MentzeUa 
piimiki in Carbon County were re-surveyed and 
their locations and extent better documented. The 
locations of several other SOC occurrences were 
revisited, though the surveys failed to relocate the 
target species. Maps showing general survey areas 
and routes are depicted in Appendix B. 

Additionally, one species that had previously been 
reported for the state, Cirsium pidcherrimum 
(Wyoming thistle) was conclusively documented 
on BLM lands from an area of Powder River 
County. In the same area, a collection of another 
plant may yield another rare plant species, though 
the collection awaits "final" identification from an 
expert in that group. See Table 3 for a summary of 
survey results. 

At the end of 2006, over 120 separate locations of 
two dozen SOC were known from Billings Field 
Office. Several species are known almost 
exclusively in Montana from these lands, including 
Astragalus oreganus, Camissonia parvula, Cleome 
lutea, Cryptantha scoparia, Malacothrix lorreyi, 
Mentzelia piimila, Nania dertsum and Poa curta. 
Numbers for the Miles City Field Office are 
similar, with 123 separate locations of 21 SOC. 
Approximately half of these locations are for one 
species. Astragalus barrii. Other SOC that rely 
heavily on BLM land in this area are Asclepias 
stenophylla. Astragalus racemosus, Cyperus 
schweinitzii, Dalea enneandra, Eriogonum visheri, 
Lomatium niittallii, Mentzelia nuda, Nuttallanthus 
texanus, Penstemon angustifolius, Physaria 
didyinocarpa var. lanata and Quercus macrocarpa. 

Billings Field Office Survey Results 

Astragalus grayi EO #3 southeast of Bridger along 
Highway 310 was resurveyed and found to be 
entirely, or almost entirely, on private land. 



Previous surveys were too vague and imprecise to 
determine the exact boundaries. EO #7, further 
south of the previous occun^ence, was also 
determined to be almost entirely on state and 
private lands with perhaps a few plants occurring 
on BLM lands. This relatively large population 
was previously mapped as two separate, disjunct 
occun^ences (EO #'s 7 & 8). 

L. Vance 2005 




Astragalus gniyi hnbiiat soiiih o\' Bridger 



A survey of BLM land for Camissonia andina EO 
#7 (Jack Creek) southeast of Bridger failed to 
relocate the species. This population of the 
diminutive, annual species was first observed in 
1991 and a follow-up survey in 1993 was also 
unable to relocate the species. 

Surveys for Cleome lutea in the Cottonwood 
Creek, Hunters Creek and Weatherman Draw area 
greatly expanded the known extent and number of 
individuals documented in the drainages. Surveys 
previous to 2005 had documented two separate 
locations for the species. 2005 surveys observed 
plants extending across several miles in these 
drainages. The area is now mapped as E0#4. 
Limited observations in 2006 in some of the same 
areas of the Cottonwood Creek drainage failed to 
observe any plants (either last year's dead stalks or 
current season's growth) of C lutea. This is 
probably due to unfavorable growing conditions 
for the species in 2006 in contrast to the favorable 
conditions of 2005. An additional location of C 
lutea was located further south along Cottonwood 
Creek on private land. 



10 



L. Vance 2005 




Cleome hilea in flower 



One new, small occurrence of Haplopappus 
carthamoides var. siibsquarrosus (EO #9) was 
located on BLM lands in the vicinity of other 
known occurrences on the east slope of the 
Beartooth Mountains. Another previously known 
occurrence (E0# 8) on state trust lands, bordering 
BLM land, was visited but no H. carthamoides var. 
siibsquarrosus was observed on the BLM land. 
Two other small occurrences (EO #'s 1 & 7) on 
BLM lands in the area were not visited during this 
trip as the land was falsely marked as private land 
with "No Trespassing signs." During 2006, two 
additional occurrences (EO #'s 5 & 6) of the plant 
on National Forest land south of Red Lodge were 
visited. 



S. M incemoyer 2006 




In total, three occun^ences of//, carthamoides var. 
subsqiiarrosiis were visited in 2006 that had been 
previously surveyed in 1995; all showed marked 
reductions in population numbers. Recent drought 
conditions in the area are presumed to be the cause 
of these observed declines. 



S,Minceinoyer2006 




Haplopiipjiiis carthamoides var. siibsquarrosus 



Haf'Uipapi.'iis LctrTliaiiioidcs \\\v. suhsi/iiarrcsus habitat 
on the east slope of the Beartooth Mountains 

Two Mentzelia pumila occurrences were revisited. 
E0# 5 (Hollenbeck Draw) south of Belfry is 
entirely on BLM land and its size was determined 
to be relatively unchanged from a 1991 survey. 
EO #1 (South Fork Bridger Creek) is on mixed 
ownership of private and BLM lands. The 
population was first observed in 1986 with over 
100 individuals. Less than 10 individuals were 
observed in 2005. 

Eriogonum brevicaule var. canum was also 
observed in the Pryor Mountain Desert/Bighorn 
Basin, though specific information pertaining to 
the occurrence was not recorded as the species will 
no longer be considered a SOC. See comments on 
this taxon in the Discussion and Recommendation 
section. 

Miles City Field Office Survey Results 

Cirsium pulcherrimum has been previously 
reported for Montana in Dawson and Treasure 
Counties (Great Plains Flora Association 1986) 
though the existence and location of specimen 
vouchers to document these reports are uncertain. 
A collection at MONTU (University of Montana 
Herbarium) from the Pryor Mountains is labeled as 



11 



this species, though its identification is uncertain. 
In 2006, collections of a thistle were made in and 
adjacent to the Buffalo Creek Wilderness Study 
Area (WSA) near Moorhead and it was tentatively 
identified as C. pulchenimum using the Flora of 
the Great Plains (GPFA 1986) and the Flora of 
North America (Keil 2006). However, no material 
in Montana herbaria was available that appeared 
morphologically similar, including the MONTU 
specimen that is labeled as C. pulcherrinnim. Two 
of the specimens were sent to Dr. David Keil at 
California Polytechnic State University, author of 
the FNA treatment on Cirsium, and the 
identifications were verified as C. pulcherrimum. 

Within the Buffalo Creek WSA, scattered 
individuals were located in two general areas 
(Appendix C). The species appears to be rare in 
the area and was not observed in other areas of 
apparently suitable habitat. Previous to this 
project, the species was ranked SU in Montana; as 
a result of these new findings the species" rank will 
change to SI and it will be added to the Montana 
SOC list. 

The identification of one plant collection from a 
ridgetop on the border of the Buffalo Creek WSA 
remains uncertain. The specimen appears to be a 
Boisduvalia sp. (Onagraceae), though it does not 
resemble the single species known from eastern 
Montana, Boisduvalia glabella (smooth spike- 
primrose). It more closely resembles B. striata 
(nan^ow-leaved boisduvalia) which is not known 
from Montana, or B. densiflora (dense spike- 
primrose) which is known from Montana from one 
historical collection in the western part of the state. 
The genus is now more typically treated in an 
expanded concept of Epilobium. The collection 
will be sent for identification to an expert in the 
Onagraceae. 

The sole Montana population of Eriogonum visheri 
growing on BLM lands east of Powderville in the 
Hell Creek Formation appears to be healthy and in 
fact may be expanding in size and extent. The 
entire area previously documented as occupied by 
the plant was not surveyed in 2005, though other 
areas not previously noted as occupied now 
contain E. visheii. 



Two new locations of Physaria brassicoides on 
BLM lands east of Powderville in the Hell Creek 
Formation were also discovered. These locations 
have currently been combined into EO #4. A 
couple hundred plants were observed in these new 
areas. One additional location off. brassicoides 
was discovered in 2005 southeast of Miles City, 
though the occurrence is on private land {or 
possibly state land) immediately adjacent to a 
block of BLM land. 



S. Mincemoyer 2005 




Physaria brassicoides habilat east of Powdeiville 

BLM lands in the Tidwell Draw area were targeted 

for survey, but poor road conditions due to recent 
rains prevented travel to the site during a visit to 
the area. 

Herbaria Searches 

Specimen label data for almost all target species 
listed in Table 1 and for some of those listed in 
Table 2 were gathered from the University of 
Montana (MONTU) and the Montana State 
University (MONT) herbaria in the fall of 2006. 
Collection of this information resulted in several 
"new" occurrences, though only one of the new 
locations was on BLM lands in the project area. 
The one new location on BLM lands was from a 
recent collection of Aslragai us geyeri in the Pryor 
Mountain Desert in the vicinity of other known 
locations. 

Specimen label data for only one species, 

Sullivantia hapemanii, was retrieved from the 
Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM) in Wyoming. 
This resulted in the mapping of one new location 
in the Bighorn Canyon NRA. 



12 



Additional Data Entry and Mapping 

Data for three globally rare species, for which 
MTNHP had not been recently tracking occurrence 
information, have been re-entered into MTNHP 
databases. BLM lands on the Billings Field Office 
contain significant occurrences of all three species. 
The three species are Erigeron allocotus, 
Penstemon caryi and Townsendia spathulata. At 
this time, all occurrences of the latter two species 
have been entered. However, occurrences for 
Erigeron allocotus reported for the Bighorn 
Canyon NRA (Heidel and Fertig 2000) have not 
been entered and it is unclear if the detailed 
documentation that would allow mapping of these 
occurrences exists. Also, 19 occurrence records 
for Psoralea hypogaea, a state rare taxon, have 
been re-entered into MTNHP databases. This 
species was previously dropped from tracking by 
MTNHP, though supporting documentation 
describing the rationale for this change is 
incomplete and vague. 

In addition to the mapping and entry of new 
species data, all occurrences on the two BLM Field 
Offices were reviewed for spatial and tabular data 
accuracy. Review of the spatial representations for 
these records resulted in a refinement of the 
mapped boundaries in many cases and in several 
additional instances added subpopulations that 
were documented by surveyors but were not 
represented in MTNHP spatial data. During this 
process several hundred mapped features were 
checked for accuracy and completeness as well as 
the corresponding tabular data. 



As part of the review of all mapped SOC 
occurrences on the two Field Offices, Astragalus 
barrii occurrences were reviewed and a change in 
the protocol for mapping/tracking this species was 
instituted to help simplify data management and 
tracking. Though the species is considered 
globally rare, it is sometimes locally common, with 
numerous mapped subpopulations or clusters 
scattered over many square miles and across 
multiple ownerships. This is often the case when 
habitat is locally abundant for a particular species 
but uncommon across the larger landscape. To 
simplify the tracking of occurrence data and the 
dissemination of the information, all observed 
areas of this species provided by surveyors are now 
mapped as separate locations (i.e. separate Element 
Occurrences). This methodology is commonly 
used for tracking SOC animal species in Montana 
to prevent the creation of very large, unwieldy 
tracking units. The alternative of tracking data at 
the population or metapopulation level, which may 
consist of dozens or even hundreds of individually 
mapped subpopulations or clusters, is cumbersome 
and problematic. As a result of this change in 
methodology, the number of mapped occurrences 
reported by MTNHP is currently 167 as compared 
to less than 50 occurrences previously. Other plant 
SOC are also likely to undergo a shift in tracking 
methodology. However, further details and 
discussion of the changes in tracking methodology 
are not presented here as it is not the purpose of 
this report. 



Table 3. Areas of BLM land surveyed during this project with major findings. Township, Range, Sections are 
provided to delineate general survey areas. The list is not intended to be a comprehensive inventory of all BLM 
areas visited nor is it intended to imply that surveys in any of the geographic areas listed below provide 
comprehensive survey coverage of the area. 



County 


Survey Sites 


Survey Date 


BLM Sections 
Surveyed 


Results 


Big Horn 


Feeback Draw 


July 23, 2005 


T8S, R43E, sec 9, 
10 


No new occurrences 


Carbon 


Bear Canyon & se 
Pry or Mountains 


June 6 & 7, 2006 


T9S, R26E, sec 3, 4, 
9, 10 


Malacothrix torreyi, 

and Nama densum not 

relocated. 1 new 

location of 

Sphaeromeria capitata 


Inferno Canyon (e 
Pryor Mountains) 


June 5 & 6, 2006 


T8S, R25E, sec 15 
& 16 


No new occurrences 



13 



County 


Survey Sites 


Survey Date 


BLM Sections 
Surveyed 


Results 




HWY310soutliof 
Bridger 


June 20-28, 2005 
and June 5, 2006 


Scattered sections 

adjacent to and near 

highway 


Revisited 4 Astragalus 
grayi occurrences 


Cottonwood Creek- 
Hunter's Creek- 
Weattierman Draw 


June 20-28, 2005 


T8S, R24E, sec 29, 

31,32 

T9S,R24E, sec4, 5, 

6 


Surveyed extensive 

Cleoine hi tea 

population 


Cub Creek — Long 
Draw 


June 1-3, 2006 


Portions of dozen 
sections in the area 


No new occurrences 


HoIlenbeckDraw 


June 30, 2005 


T9S, R22E, sec 9 


Revisited MentzeUa 
piim'da occurrence 


Mill Draw -Ruby 

Creek Areas (East 

slope Beartooth) 


June 4, 2006 


Scattered sec in 
T9S, R20E 
T9S, R21E 


No new occurrences 


Grove Creek (East 
slope Beartooth) 


August 16-18, 
2006 


T8S, R20E, sec 25, 
26,35 


1 new occurrence of 

Haplopappus 

carthamoides var. 

subsquaiTosus 


South Fork Bridger 
Creek 


June 30, 2005 


TVS, R24E, sec 19 
&20 


Revisited MentzeUa 
piimila occurrence 


Carter 


Soda Lakes 


July 20, 2005 


TIS, R58E, sec26 


No new occurrences 


Powderville Road - 
Hell Creek Formation 


July 21-22, 2005 


TIS, R55E, sec4, 9 


Eriogonum visheri 
population resurveyed 

2 new locations of 
Phy.saria brassicoides 


Keith Creek 


July 21, 2005 


T3S, R56E, sec 23 


No new occurrences 


Cottonwood Creek - 
Dead Horse Point 


June 26, 2006 


Scattered sec in 

T6S, R58 & 59E 

TVS, R59E 

T8S, R59E 


No new occurrences 


Dead Boy Creek — 
Lone Tree Creek 


July 20-21, 2005 


T2S, R58E 


No new occurrences 


Custer 


Strawberry Hill 


July 19, 2005 


T8N, R48E sec 23- 
24 


1 new occurrence of 

Physaiia brassicoides 

located on adjacent 

private land 


Powder River 


Boxelder Creek — Bales 
Creek — Bear Creek 


June 28 & 29, 

2005 and June 22, 

2006 


T9S, R45E, sec 12, 

13,24 

T9S,R46E, sec6, 7, 

18 


No new occurrences 


Trail Creek (NW of 
Moorhead) 


July 24, 2005 


T9S, R4VE, sec 1 
T9S, R48E, sec 6 


No new occurrences 


Kelsey Hill 


July 24, 2005 


T9S, R48E, sec 17 


No new occurrences 


Spear Hills 


June 24, 2006 


T9S, R48E, sec 30- 
32 


Failed to relocate 

Physaiia brassicoides 

occurrence 



14 



County 


Survey Sites 


Survey Date 


BLM Sections 
Surveyed 


Results 




Jenkins Creek - Buffalo 
Creek WSA 


June 23, 2006 


T8S, R48E, sec 28 
sel/4, 33, 34 


Cirsiuin 

pulcl^errimum, a new 

Species of Concern for 

Montana documented; 

new species of 

Boisduvalia 

potentially 

documented (ID 

requires verification) 


Bootjack Draw - 
Buffalo Creek WSA 


July 25, 2005 and 
June 24, 2006 


T8S, R48E, sec9- 
11, 14 


Cirsium 
pulcherrimum, a new 
Species of Concern for 
Montana documented 


Prong Creek 


July 25, 2005 


TVS, R48E, sec 13 
TVS, R49E, sec 18 


No new occurrences 


Belle Creek — Pine 
Cieek 


June 25, 2006 


TVS, R53E, sec IV, 

18,20,21,28,29, 

33 


No new occurrences 


Prairie 


Big Sheep Mountains 
Little Sheep Mountains 


July 18-26,2005 


Scattered sec in 
T15N, R46E 
T15N, R4VE 
T15N, R48E 
TUN, R46E 
TUN, R48E 
TUN, R48E 
TUN, R50E 
T13N, R46E 
T13N, R4VE 
T13N, R48E 


No new occurrences 



15 



Discussion AND Recommendations 



Future surveys on BLM lands within the study 
area are likely to find additional occurrences of 
vascular plant Species of Concern, BLM 
Sensitive plant species and even additions to the 
known flora of the state. Though this study 
increases the knowledgebase of information in 
regards to rare plants in the study area, it, as well 
as any other survey effort that covers very large 
geographic areas, is neither definitive nor 
comprehensive. 

The 2006 field season ended up to be suboptimal 
for the survey of many SOC in the area as it was 
a "dry" year, or at least precipitation did not fall 
during time periods that would result in "good" 
growth for many plant species. For instance. 
Astragalus grayi plants were observed to be 
mostly in non-flowering condition in 2006, and 
Cleome lutea which flowered profusely in 2005 
could not be relocated the following season in 
the same vicinity. In contrast, early season rains 
in 2005 resulted in favorable growing conditions 
during that year. However, the precipitation at 
times impeded travel as many roads in the study 
area are not drivable when wet due to the high 
clay content of many of the soils. Additionally, 
optimal survey times for individual species 
varies, so a single site visit to an area is apt to 
miss species that have not flowered or for which 
the morphological condition of the plants are no 
longer adequate for identification. 

Future Survey and Monitoring 
Recommend ations 

Initiate monitoring of populations of BLM 
Sensitive plants. The current lack of monitoring 
data for most, if not all, BLM Sensitive and 
Montana SOC plants in the project area severely 
limits any conservation and management 
recommendations that can be made for particular 
species, landscapes or watersheds. Additionally, 
more comprehensive survey efforts that include 
federal, state and private lands may show that 
certain taxa are more abundant than previously 
thought and not in need of conservation 
measures or protection. The specific need is for 



annual or other semi-regular monitoring of a 
subset of SOC populations for the purpose of 
monitoring trends and changes in land 
management. The general surveys conducted as 
part of this project, as well as most of the others 
mentioned previously, do not provide the depth 
of information required to make firm 
conclusions or recommendations about a 
species' ecology or management. 

BLM lands surrounding Soda Lakes warrant 
additional surveys for plants listed as either 
BLM Sensitive or Montana SOC. A single visit 
to the area in 2005 did not adequately survey the 
area in extent or in terms of vegetation 
phenology. The isolated and patchy nature of 
BLM lands surrounding the lakes, particularly 
the northern lake, complicates surveying the 
area. 

S. MLncemoyer2005 




Soda Lakes 

BLM lands encompassing the Teny Badlands 
still require surveys for plant SOC and BLM 
Sensitive plants. The area may include suitable 
habitat for species such as Astragalus barrii and 
Physaria brassicoides, as well as other rare 
plants. 

Additional surveys for Astragalus barrii are 
needed. Surveys during 2005-2006 generally 
took place too late in the growing season for 
identification of the species. Surveys during 
mid-May to the beginning of June when the 
species is in flower are required to separate it 



16 



from the closely related A. gilviflorus and A. 
hyalifuis which are common in portions of the 
study area, and grow in the same habitats as A. 
harrii. Surveys for this species are needed on 
federal, state and private ownerships to 
determine its abundance and population numbers 
in the state. Suitable habitat for the species 
appears to be plentiful in eastern Montana and it 
is possible that additional surveys on multiple 
ownerships may find the species to be more 
abundant than previously known and possibly 
determine that the species is not in need of any 
special conservation measures or designation. 
Upcoming predictive modeling work will help 
define and map potentially suitable habitat for 
the species which should help greatly in guiding 
future survey efforts. 

Monitoring of the population dynamics for 
Haplopappiis carthamoides var. subsqiiatrosiis 
on BLM and National Forest lands is needed. 
Limited data between the two survey years of 
1995 and 2006 shows a drastic decline in 
numbers. However, this observation is limited 
to surveys on only three populations. Additional 
monitoring will be needed to determine if this is 
a temporary reduction, possibly related to 
drought conditions in the Carbon County area, 
part of normal temporal population fluctuations, 
or if other factors are at play. 

Additional surveys and better documentation of 
existing populations of Sphaeromeria capitata 
on federal ownerships are needed to properly 
review the global and state ranks for this species. 
Surveys are needed in Beaverhead, Big Horn 
and Carbon Counties. Though the global rank is 
currently a G3, better documentation of the 
species' range and abundance is likely to find 
that a 04 rank is more appropriate. No change 
in rank is proposed at this time. 



S. Mincemoyer2006 




Sphaeromeria capitata growing on the lower slopes 
of the Pryor Mountains 

Surveys for Aster glaiicodes (gray aster) are 
needed in the Pryor Mountain area to provide 
increased documentation on population levels 
and geographic distribution of the species to 
support the state rank of the species. The 
species is currently ranked S3 in Montana 
though available data do not conclusively 
support such a rank and it is unclear as to 
whether additional data would support the 
cun^ent rank. A rank of S2 for the species may 
be more appropriate. Suitable habitat on 
National Forest, BLM and National Park Service 
lands should be surveyed. No change in rank is 
proposed at this time. 

BLM Status Recommendations 

Recommend the removal of Dichantheliiim 
oligosanthes var. scribnericiiutm from the BLM 
Sensitive Plant Species List. The species has not 
been conclusively documented from BLM lands 
to date. Reports of the species on BLM lands 
from MTNHP data are due to the large 
imprecision associated with the mapping of 
historical collections with imprecise locality 
data. Suitable habitat for the species on BLM 
lands is likely very limited in extent. 



Recommend the removal of Amorpha canescens 
from the BLM Sensitive Plant Species List. The 
species has not been conclusively documented 
from BLM lands to date. Reports of the species 
on BLM lands from MTNHP data are due to the 
large imprecision associated with the mapping 
of historical collections with vague locality data. 



17 



Recommend the removal of Potentilla plattensis 
from the BLM Sensitive Plant Species List. The 
species has not been conclusively documented 
from BLM lands to date. Reports of the species 
on BLM lands from MTNHP data are due to the 
large imprecision associated with the mapping 
of historical collections with vague locality data. 
Suitable habitat for the species on BLM lands is 
likely very limited in extent. 

Recommend the removal of Eleocharis 
rostellata from the BLM Sensitive Plant Species 
List. The species had been listed as occurring 
on BLM lands due to an incorrectly mapped 
occurrence at the Bluewater Fish Hatchery near 
Bridger. This error was noticed as part of the 
review of all mapped occurrences on the two 
Field Offices that was previously mentioned. At 
this time, there are no known occurrences of the 
species on BLM lands in Montana. Suitable 
habitat for the species on BLM lands is likely 
very limited in extent. 

Recommend the removal of Sullivantia 
hapemanii from the BLM Sensitive Plant 
Species List. The species is not known to occur 
on BLM lands in Montana. The species is 
known from seeps and springs generally along 
canyon walls in the Bighorn canyon area. 
Suitable habitat for the species on BLM lands is 
likely very limited in extent if present at all. 

Recommend the addition of Cirsium 
pulcherrimum to the BLM Sensitive Plant 
Species List. This species was located on BLM 
lands in Montana for the first time during the 
course of this project. The species was found in 
or near the Buffalo Creek Wilderness Study 
Area where it was observed in only a couple 
locations with few, individual plants. It can be 
considered rare in the state at this time and will 
receive a state rank of SI. 

Heritage Status Recommendations 
and Clianges 

A change in the state rank of Cirsium 
pulcherrimum from SU to SI. See comments 
above. 



A change in the state rank in June 2006 for 
Artemisia pedatifida from S3 to S4, thus 
removing it from any further tracking by 
MTNHP at this time due to its abundance in the 
Big Horn Basin/Pryor Mountain Desert of 
Carbon County. In fact, the species is a 
dominant species throughout large portions of 
this area. This status change is supported in part 
by the previous work of Lesica and Achuff 
(1992a). 

A change in the state rank in June 2006 for 
Platyschkuhria inlegrifolia (basindaisy) from S3 
to S3S4, thus removing it from any further 
tracking by MTNHP at this time due to its 
abundance in the Big Horn Basin/Pryor 
Mountain Desert of Carbon County. This 
change is supported by the previous work of 
Lesica and Achuff (1992a) who reported 58 
"populations" and that the species is "abundant 
throughout much of the study area." 

A change in the state rank in June 2006 for 
Xylorhiza glabriuscula (smooth woodyaster) 
from S3 to S4, thus removing it from any further 
tracking by MTNHP at this time due to its 
abundance in the Big Horn Basin/Pryor 
Mountain Desert of Carbon County. This 
change is supported by the previous work of 
Lesica and Achuff (1992a) who reported 26 
large "populations" and that the species is 
"common in the study area." 

A change in the state rank for Haplopappus 
multicaulis (branched goldenweed) from S3 to 
S3S4 thus removing it from any further tracking 
by MTNHP at this time due to its abundance in 
Carter County and apparent lack of threats. 
Though the species has a limited distribution in 
Montana, it is common in portions of the county, 
including along some roadsides on BLM lands. 

A change in the state rank for Eriogonum 
brevicaule var. caniim from S3 to S3S4 and 
removal from further tracking by the MTNHP. 
It is recommended that the global rank be 
changed accordingly from 03 to 0304 or 04. 
The Wyoming Natural Diversity Database has 
global rank responsibility for this taxon and the 
recommendation has been passed along to that 



program. The abundance of the taxon in 
Montana has been previously documented by 
Lesica and Achuff ( 1 992a, b) and by Heidel and 
Fertig (2000). Both of these reports recognize 
the number of large populations of the species 
and the apparent lack of threats to the species' 
viability. Heidel and Fertig (2000) also state 
that "No special management is required to 
ensure the survival of the species." 

Additional Recommendations and 
Discussion 

One taxon currently listed as BLM Sensitive and 
as a Montana SOC, Physaria didymocarpa van 
lanata, may be of questionable morphological 
recognition. A recent review of all P. 
didymocarpa collections at MONTU by Peter 
Lesica noted that the character (spreading leaf 
trichomes) by which variety lanata is 
distinguished appears to be continuous and not 
readily distinct (Lesica, pers. comm. 2006). 
Additional study and information will be needed 
before any change in status is made or 
recommended. 

Information on the biology, ecology, rank 
factors and management implications as they 
pertain to individual Species of Concern can be 
found on the MTNHP's web-based Rare Plant 
Field Guide ( www.mtnhp.org) . 

Priority Areas 

Several areas of BLM lands in the project area 
are of note due to the diversity and/or abundance 
of one or more BLM Sensitive, Montana SOC or 
other plants of limited distribution. 

Pryor Mountain Desert: The Pryor 

Mountain Desert - Bighorn Basin area contains 
one of the most unique floras in the state and 
hosts several state and globally rare vascular 
plant taxa (Lesica and Achuff 1992a). 
Additionally, the area provides critical habitat 
for several animal species of significance in 
Montana including the Black-throated Gray 
Warbler, Blue-gray Gnatcatcher, white-tailed 
prairie dog and the pallid bat (Hendricks 2004, 
Hendricks et al. 2004, Wilson 1 996, MTNHP 



2006). As such, appropriate management of the 
area to maintain viable populations, intact 
habitats and ecosystem processes is critical to 
the survival of many species in the state. 
This area encompasses lands generally south of 
National Forest lands in the Pryors to the 
Montana-Wyoming border, and west to 
Highway 3 1 and east to the Bighorn Canyon 
NRA. The habitats of this area contain a 
significant proportion of the overall range and/or 
populations of numerous plant species that are 
listed as BLM Sensitive, Montana SOC or are 
otherwise rare or of limited distribution. 
Included in this category are plants such as 
Artemisia pedatifida. Astragalus geyeri, 
Astragalus grayi. Astragalus oreganus, 
Camissonia andina, Camissonia patvula, 
Erigeron allocotiis, Eriogonum brevicaule var. 
canuin, Grayia spinosa, Leptodactylon 
caespitosum, LesquereUa lesicii, Malacothrix 
torreyi, Mentzelia pumila, Nama densum. 
Penstemon laricifolius, Platyschkuhria 
inlegrifolia, Sphaeromeria capitata, Stanleya 
tomentosa (woolly princesplume) and 
Townsendia spathulata. 



S. Mincemoyer 2006 




>.' -iL '- - 

Inferno Canyon on the west slope of the Pryor 
Mountains 

The importance of this area to numerous plant 
species of significance is hard to overemphasize 
and it is perhaps second in importance state- 
wide only to areas of Beaverhead County. 

Meeteetse Spires-Grove Creek: The 

Meeteetse Spires and surrounding BLM lands on 
the east flank of the Beartooth Plateau are 



19 



known to contain two vascular plant taxa of 
significance, Shoshonea pulvinala and 
Haplopappiis caithamoides var. subsqitanosits. 
Both taxa are globally rare and are endemic to 
south-central Montana and adjacent Wyoming. 
The Shoshonea occurrence is one of only five 
known from Montana. BLM, state and private 
lands are interspersed in the area resulting in 
potentially conflicting resource management 
objectives. The core of this area encompasses 
only about six square miles immediately 
adjacent to National Forest land. A second area 
immediately to the south along the Wyoming 
border and adjacent to National Forest land 
contains significant populations of//. 
caiihaiiioides var. subsquanosiis in an area of 
mixed BLM and private ownerships. 



S. Mincemoyer 2006 




Biddle-Belle Creek: BLM lands in the 
Biddle-Belle Creek area cover several thousand 
acres though they are scattered in distribution. 
This area contains some of the most important 
habitat for the globally rare Astragalus barrii. 
BLM and private lands in the area contain 
perhaps the densest concentration of populations 
of this species range-wide. Any detrimental 
change in land management or alterations of the 
habitat that would result in adverse effects to 
this metapopulation is likely to result in 
significant impacts to the species" long-term 
viability in the region. 



S. M ince 



yer2005 




Belle Creek Drainage 



Grove Creek drainage and the Meeteetse Spires along 
the east flank of the Beartooth Plateau 



20 



References 



Barton, D. and S. Crispin. 2003. Globally 
significant plants in southeastern Big Horn and 
southwestern Rosebud counties, Montana. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
26 pp. + app. 

Bureau of Land Management. 2005. 
Montana/Dakotas ELM Sensitive Plant Species 
List. Montana State Office, Billings, MT. 9 pp. 

Carlson, J. C. and S. V. Cooper. 2003. Plant and 
animal resources and ecological condition of the 
Hanging Woman Basin in Big Horn County, 
Montana and Sheridan County, Wyoming. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
25 pp. + app. 

Dorn, R. D. 2001. Vascular plants of Wyoming - 
Third Edition. Mountain West Publishing, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming. 412 pp. 

Dorn, R. D. 1984. Vascular plants of Montana. 
Mountain West Publishing, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming. 276 pp. 

Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the 
Great Plains. University of Kansas Press. 
Lawrence, Kansas. 

Heidel, B. 2001. Monitoring Shoshonea pulvinala 
in the Pryor and Beartooth Mountains, Carbon 
County, Montana. 1999 Trend Report to the 
Bureau of Land Management, MT. Montana 
Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 1 1 pp. + 
app. 

Heidel, B. 1 997. Preliminary Botanical Survey of 
the Tongue River Area. Unpublished Report to 
Montana Department of Environmental Quality. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
1 1 pp + app. 



Heidel,B.L. and K. H. Dueholm. 1995. Sensitive 
plant survey in the Sioux District, Custer 
National Forest: 1994; Carter County, Montana 
and Harding County, South Dakota. 
Unpublished report to the Custer National 
Forest. Montana Natural Heritage Program, 
Helena. 95 pp. + app. 

Heidel, B. and W.Fertig. 2000. Rare Plants of 
Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area. 
Report to the National Fish and Wildlife 
Foundation and Bighorn Canyon National 
Recreation Area. Montana Natural Heritage 
Program, Helena and Wyoming Natural 
Diversity Database, Laramie. 63 pp. + app. 

Heidel, B., C.Jean and S.Crispin. 2002. Plant 
Species of Concern and Plant Associations of 
Powder River County, Montana. Report to the 
Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural 
Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 23 pp. + app. 

Heidel, B.L. and H.Marriott. 1996. Sensitive 
plant species survey of the Ashland District, 
Custer National Forest, Powder River and 
Rosebud Counties, Montana. Unpublished 
report to the Custer National Forest. Montana 
Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 94 pp. + 
app. 

Hendricks, P. 2004. First nesting record of black- 
throated gray warbler (Dendroica nigrescens) for 
Montana. Western North American Naturalist. 
Vol 64(4). October 2004. pp. 548-550. 

Hendricks, P., C. Currier and J. Carlson. 2004. 
Bats of the BLM Billings Field Office in south- 
central Montana, with emphasis on the Pryor 
Mountains. Report to the Bureau of Land 
Management. Montana Natural Heritage 
Program, Helena, MT. 19 pp. + app. 



Heidel, B. 1 993. Survey for Quercus macrocarpa 
in the Powder River Resource Area, Miles City 
District, Bureau of Land Management, Montana. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
12 pp. + app. 



Keil,D. 2006. Cirsium. In: Flora of North 
America Editorial Committee, eds. 1993+. 
Flora of North America North of Mexico. 1 2+ 
vols. New York and Oxford. Vol. 19. pp. 95- 
164. 



21 



Lesica. P. 2003. Conserving globally rare plants 
on lands administered by the Dillon Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management. Report to the 
USD! Bureau of Land Management, Dillon Field 
Office. Montana Natural Heritage Program, 
Helena, MT. 22 pp. + app. 

Lesica, P. 1995a. Conservation status of 
Haplopappiis caithamoides var. subsquanosus 
in Montana. Unpublished report to the US 
Forest Service and the Bureau of Land 
Management. Montana Natural Heritage 
Program, Helena, MT. 22 pp. + app. 

Lesica, P. 1995b. Conservation status of 
Lesqueiella lesicii in Montana. Unpublished 
report to the US Forest Service and the Bureau 
of Land Management. Montana Natural 
Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 16 pp. + app. 

Lesica,P. andP. L. Achuff. 1992a. Distribution 
of vascular plant species of special concern and 
limited distribution in the Pryor Mountain 
Desert, Carbon County, Montana. Unpublished 
report to the Bureau of Land Management. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
38 pp. + app. 

Lesica, P. and P. L. Achuff. 1992b. Conservation 
status of Eriogoniim x lagopus in southern 
Carbon County, Montana. Unpublished report to 
the Bureau of Land Management. Montana 
Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 13 pp. + 
app. 

Mincemoyer, S. 2005. Surveys of significant 
plant resources and related vegetation types for 
the Butte Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management. Report to the USDI Bureau of 
Land Management, Butte Field Office. Montana 
Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 1 1 pp. + 
app. 



Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2006. Biotics 
Database - December 2006. Helena, MT. 

Schassberger, L. A. 1988. Status review of 
Astragalus barrii: USDA Forest Service - 
Region 1, Custer National Forest, Montana. 
Unpublished report the USDA Forest Service. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
21 pp. + app. 



Shelly, J. S. 1988. Report on the Conservation 
status of Shoshonea pulvinata, a Candidate 
threatened species. Montana Natural Heritage 
Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp. + appendices. 

Taylor, A. and R. Caners. 2002. Baseline survey 
for Astragalus barrii Barneby (Barr's milkvetch) 
and Physaria didymocarpa var. lanata A. Nels. 
(woolly twinpod) in eastern Big Horn and 
southwestern Rosebud counties, Montana. 
Report to the Bureau of Land Management. 
Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 
8 pp. + app. 

Vanderhorst, J., S. V. Cooper and B. L. Heidel. 
1998. Botanical and vegetation surveys of 
Carter County, Montana. Unpublished report to 
the Bureau of Land Management. Montana 
Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 116 pp. 
+ app. 

Wright, P. L. 1996. Status of rare birds in 
Montana, with comments on known hybrids. 
Northwestern Naturalist. Vol. 77(3). Winter 
1996. pp. 57-85. 



22 



Appendix A. Global/State Rank Definitions 



HERITAGE PROGRAM RANKS 

The international network of Natural Heritage Programs employs a standardized ranking system 
to denote global (range-wide) and state status. Species are assigned numeric ranks ranging from 1 
to 5, reflecting the relative degree to which they are "at-risk". Rank definitions are given below. 
A number of factors are considered in assigning ranks — the number, size and distribution of 
known "occurrences" or populations, population trends (if known), habitat sensitivity, and threat. 
Factors in a species' life history that make it especially vulnerable are also considered (e.g., 
dependence on a specific pollinator). 

GLOBAL RANK DEFINITIONS (NatureServe 2003) 

Gl Critically imperiled because of extreme rarity and/or other factors making it 

highly vulnerable to extinction 
G2 Imperiled because of rarity and/or other factors making it vulnerable to extinction 

G3 Vulnerable because of rarity or restricted range and/or other factors, even though 

it may be abundant at some of its locations 
G4 Apparently secure, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at 

the periphery 
G5 Demonstrably secure, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially 

at the periphery 
T 1 -5 Infraspeciflc Taxon (trinomial) — The status of infraspecific taxa (subspecies or 

varieties) are indicated by a 'T-rank" following the species' global rank 

STATE RANK DEFINITIONS 

51 At high risk because of extremely limited and potentially declining numbers, 
extent and/or habitat, making it highly vulnerable to extirpation in the state 

52 At risk because of very limited and potentially declining numbers, extent and/or 
habitat, making it vulnerable to extirpation in the state 

53 Potentially at risk because of limited and potentially declining numbers, extent 
and/or habitat, even though it may be abundant in some areas 

54 Uncommon but not rare (although it may be rare in parts of its range), and 
usually widespread. Apparently not vulnerable in most of its range, but possibly 
cause for long-term concern 

55 Common, widespread, and abundant (although it may be rare in parts of its 
range). Not vulnerable in most of its range 

COMBINATION RANKS 

G#G# or S#S# Range Rank — A numeric range rank (e.g., G2G3) used to indicate uncertainty 
about the exact status of a taxon 

QUALIFIERS 

NR Not ranked 

Q Questionable taxonomy that may reduce conservation priority — 

Distinctiveness of this entity as a taxon at the current level is questionable; 
resolution of this uncertainty may result in change from a species to a subspecies 
or hybrid, or inclusion of this taxon in another taxon, with the resulting taxon 
having a lower-priority (numerically higher) conservation status rank 



Appendix A - 1 



X Presumed Extinct — Species believed to be extinct throughout its range. Not 

located despite intensive searches of historical sites and other appropriate habitat, 

and virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered 
H Possibly Extinct — Species known from only historical occurrences, but may 

never-theless still be extant; further searching needed 
U Unrankable — Species currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to 

substantially conflicting information about status or trends 
HYB Hybrid — Entity not ranked because it represents an interspecific hybrid and not 

a species 
? Inexact Numeric Rank — Denotes inexact numeric rank 

C Captive or Cultivated Only — Species at present is extant only in captivity or 

cultivation, or as a reintroduced population not yet established 
A Accidental — Species is accidental or casual in Montana, in other words, 

infrequent and outside usual range. Includes species (usually birds or butterflies) 

recorded once or only a few times at a location. A few of these species may have 

bred on the one or two occasions they were recorded 
Z Zero Occurrences — Species is present but lacking practical conservation 

concern in Montana because there are no definable occurrences, although the 

taxon is native and appears regularly in Montana 
P Potential — Potential that species occurs in Montana but no extant or historic 

occurrences are accepted 
R Reported — Species reported in Montana but without a basis for either accepting 

or rejecting the report, or the report not yet reviewed locally. Some of these are 

very recent discoveries for which the program has not yet received first-hand 

information; others are old, obscure reports 
SYN Synonym — Species reported as occurring in Montana, but the Montana Natural 

Heritage Program does not recognize the taxon; therefore the species is not 

assigned a rank 
* A rank has been assigned and is under review. Contact the Montana Natural 

Heritage Program for assigned rank 
B Breeding — Rank refers to the breeding population of the species in Montana 

N Nonbreeding — Rank refers to the non-breeding population of the species in 

Montana 



Appendix A - 2 



Appendix B. Maps of General Survey Areas and 
Routes Listed by County 



Maps of General Survey Areas and Routes Listed by County 

Survey routes are provided to show general areas that were surveyed and are not intended to display 
detailed survey routes, nor are all BLM areas that were visited during this project shown in the maps 
below. 

List of Maps 

Big Horn County: 

Map 1. FeebackDraw B-2 

Carbon County: 

Map 2. Southeast Pryor Mountains B - 2 

Map 3. HoUenbeck-Long-Williams Draws-Cub Creek B - 3 

Map 4. Grove Creek-Meeteetse Spires B - 3 

Map 5. Bridger Area B - 4 

Map 6. HWY310-Jack Creek south of Bridger B -4 

Carter County: 

Map 7. Soda Lakes B - 5 

Map 8. Deadhorse Point-Cottonwood Creek B - 5 

Map 9. Keith Creek B-6 

Map 10. Hell Creek Formation east of Powderville B - 6 

Custer County: 

Map 1 1. Strawberry Hill area east of Miles City B - 7 

Powder River County: 

Map 12. Belle Creek-Pine Creek B- 7 

Map 13. Moorhead-Buffalo Creek-Spear Hills B - 8 

Map 14. Prong Creek B-8 

Map 15. Boxelder Creek-Bales Creek-Bear Creek B-9 

Prairie County: 

Map 16. Big Sheep Mountains B- 9 

Map 17. Little Sheep Mountains B - W 

Map 18. Homestead and Innes Reservoirs B - JO 



Appendix B - 1 



Big Horn County 

Map 1. Feeback Draw. 




Carbon County 

Map 2. Southeast Pryor Mountains. 







Appendix B - 2 



Map 3. Hoi I enbeck-Long -Williams Draws-Cub Creek. 




Map 4. Grove Creek-Meeteetse Spires. 




Appendix B - 3 



Map 5. Bridger Area. 




Map 6. HWY 310-Jack Creek south of Bridger. 







Appendix B - 4 



Carter County 

Map 7. Soda Lakes. 




Map 8. Deadhorse Point-Cottonwood Creek. 




Appendix B - 5 



Map 9. Keith Creek. 

'' lOIB.. 




^-|^%K>-? 



■ <-^ 



^H-^^-^^I^W^^KH 



Map 10. Hell Creek Formation east of Powdervllle. 




Appendix B - 6 



Custer County 

Map 1 1 . Strawberry Hill area east of Miles City. 

V, """ " 




Powder River County 

Map 12. Belle Creek-Pine Creek 




Trr- 






■ , I 
I 

I 




Appendix B - 7 



Map 13. Moorhead-Buffalo Creek-Spear Hills. 




Map 14. Prong Creek. 




Appendix B - 8 



Map 15. Boxelder Creek-Bales Creek-Bear Creek. 




Prairie County 

Map 16. Big Sheep Mountains (Surveyed BLM lands outlined in red). 



m- 




Appendix B - 9 



Map 17. Little Sheep Mountains (Surveyed BLM lands outlined in red). 







Map 18. Homestead and Innes Reservoirs (Surveyed BLM lands outlined in red). 




•"Lands shaded in pink are Bankhead-Jones Lands administered by the BLM 



Appendix B - 10 



Appendix C. Species Account for Cirsium 

pulcherrimum 




Cirisiiin piilchenimiiin in ihe Buffalo 
Creek WSA 



Cirsium pulchenimum (Asteraceae) 
Wyoming Thistle 

BLM Status: None 
Heritage Ranking: G5/S1 

RANK JUSTIFICATION: In Montana, known conclusively 

from one area of Powder River County where a small number 
of scattered individuals where observed in 2006. Also, 
reported for Dawson and Garfield Counties by Flora of the 
Great Plains (GPFA 1986). 

IDENTIFICATION: Taprooted perennial with 1-few erect 
stems that are arachnoid -tomentose or sometimes glabrate. 
Flowers are pink to purple, 1 8-25 mm long. The I to several 
heads are borne singly or in 2-3-headed clusters at the tips of 
the main stem and branches in a typically open inflorescence, 
heads may also be present in distal axils. Leaf blades are 
linear to oblong, oblanceolate, or elliptic, 5-25 x 0.6-7 cm, 
unlobed and merely spinulose or spiny-dentate to regularly 
pinnatifid, typically with 5-8 pairs of lobes that are well 
separated, and usually with broad, U-shaped sinuses. Spines 
are slender and 2-7 mm long. Lower leaf surfaces are usually 
densely arachnoid-tomentose, while upper surfaces are typically 

green, glabrous or less commonly thinly to densely gray-tomentose; basal leaves are often present at 
flowering. Cauline leaves well distributed along stem, gradually reduced upwards, lower leaves usually 
winged-petiolate, while mid and upper leaves typically are sessile, leaves decurrent along stem for 1 .5-3.5 
cm. Involucres are ovoid to campanulate, 1.8-2.7 x 1-2 cm, thinly arachnoid-tomentose or glabrate. 
Bracts are in 6-7 overlapping series, green or with a dark subapical patch or appendage, linear to linear- 
lanceolate, margins entire, abaxial faces with narrow glutinous ridge; outer and middle bases appressed, 
apical appendages spreading to stiffly ascending, linear-lanceolate to acicular, entire, spines spreading or 

ascending, stout. 2-7 mm, often flattened; apices of 
inner bracts erect or sometimes flexuous, naiTow, 
flat. Pappus is 14-16 mm long, (adapted from 
treatment in Flora of North America vol 19). 

Flowering occurs in June to July. 

Similar species include Cirsium canescens and C 
flodmanii both of which occur in eastern Montana. 
The former can usually be distinguished by having 
the upper leaf surfaces being slightly tomentose and 
by the leaf lobes being over 3.5 times as long as 
wide. The latter species usually has stem leaves that 
only clasp the stem or are short-decurrent compared 
to the typically, long-decurrent leaves (middle leaves 
with wings usually >15 mm long) of C. 
pidcbenimum. A technical manual should be 
,, ,. consulted for positive identification. 

Cirsium pulchcnini mil iiLibitat 




Appendix C - J 



HABITAT: Sparsely -vegetated soils of washes and steep, eroded gullies in dissected or badlands 
topography. Associated species include Jiiniperiis scopuloruni, Chrysothamnus nauseosiis, Artemisia 
ludoviciana, Atriplex confertifolia and 
Elymus trachycaulis. In other areas, this 
species is listed as typically growing in 
rocky or stony soils. However, in our area 
the species has also been noted from fine- 
textured soils. 



GLOBAL RANGE: Eastern Montana, 
south to Wyoming, n Colorado, ne Utah, 
nw Nebraska and west to se Idaho. 

ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT: 

The effects, if any of the introduced 
Rhinocyllus weavil on this species are 
unknown. Additional information on this 
species' ecology and management in 
Montana are lacking at this time. 




I ■-, 



■->,- 



b-t 



M 



Cirsium pulcherrimum locations 






Appendix C - 2